Perhaps it was the heat. Perhaps it was my mood, in combination with the
sweat trickling down my neck - a silent crying plea from my psyche begging for
air conditioning. Please pardon the reference to my spoiled, "First World
Problem". Unfortunately, I did not enjoy the Key Notes Speaker on Friday
morning. While I can respect much of Cheryl McLean's opinions, I found her, as
a speaker, hard to follow and, dare I say it, "wordy". As is often
the case with various academics (myself included by times).
So as to avoid negativity in the 'blogasphere', I will make a concerted
effort to focus on the positives of Cheryl's presentation. From what I could
decode, Cheryl made many references to taking what is ordinary and making
it extraordinary. Cliché though it may be, I agree that our job as teachers is to
turn the mundane and seemingly dull content of a curriculum guide into an
engaging lesson plan, whereby kids will feel empowered to change the world.
Cheryl pointed out that there is an “exhausting pressure on grad students to
change the world”. I would argue this pressure also exists at the high school
level (both for teachers and students). Teachers feel burdened by the task of
having to instill “greatness” in their students and students feel burdened when
they do not meet this ideal.
Cheryl also made reference to the “changing tides in Creativity”, by stating
that “progressive thinkers are essential to education” and that “creativity
suffers when working for marks". Although I (think) I understand what she is
trying to say, I somewhat disagree. I believe that creativity is pertinent to
education in conjunction with competition (ie marks)". It seems that the dreaded
red X has become taboo in education. Apparently it can damage a child’s psyche and
therefore stifle their creativity. I grew up with loads of X’s on loads of
various assignments and I saw the X’s as challenges to overcome. I was not personally
offended by being wrong. Instead, I was motivated to work harder. I am now
thankful that I had teachers who were not afraid to tell me I was wrong.
In addition to her point about creativity being important in education,
Cheryl also pointed out that creativity can be used to help promote a socially
just learning environment. She talked about using creativity to acknowledge and
discuss social justice issues. Cheryl’s example was that a Drama teacher could
possibly intervene in instances of bullying. I would suggest that we apply this
notion to a larger scale and bring in current issues from today’s world. Using
the Arts for closure is a fantastic way to incorporate Arts into the ‘real’
world.
I agree with you on the morning keynote. I felt that the topic was great but could have possible been presented in a more straight forward fashion. As you stated, it may have also been the heat getting to me. I do however agree and see her point that creativity is important in education. As teachers, we are required to provide students with lessons in creative ways all the time. If we didn't do this we would most likely loose the attention of many. Most jobs tend to work this way or at least seem to make people the happiest when creativity is used. If it is this way in the real world then we should be teaching it in school.
ReplyDelete